Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1295

reference
999-tree-1
name
1295
tree-preservation-order

undefined

999-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.030810 50.872317)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.030781 50.872314,-1.030782 50.872320,-1.030786 50.872325,-1.030793 50.872329,-1.030809 50.872332,-1.030818 50.872332,-1.030826 50.872329,-1.030837 50.872320,-1.030838 50.872315,-1.030837 50.872309,-1.030833 50.872304,-1.030819 50.872297,-1.030810 50.872296,-1.030801 50.872297,-1.030793 50.872300,-1.030787 50.872304,-1.030781 50.872314)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL